The Ford Transit
- andyofcolumbusmerkur
- Level 7
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:58 pm
- Location: NE Ohio
The Ford Transit
Are these as good as the old "Freightliner" MB/Dodge sprinter vans? Are they as good or better than the Ram Promasters? This Transit has almost 400k on the clock! So they seem to last if well maintained.
https://akroncanton.craigslist.org/cto/ ... 14415.html
https://akroncanton.craigslist.org/cto/ ... 14415.html
The car will be finished soon.
- brokencase
- Level 7
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 12:18 pm
- Location: PA
-
- Level 8
- Posts: 8669
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:53 pm
- Location: The Belly of The Beast
Re: The Ford Transit
Exceptional condition. Incredible for 400K Mike's. No signs of wear visible in the photos.
78 service records = substantial maintenance and substantial maintenance expenditure.
YMMV
78 service records = substantial maintenance and substantial maintenance expenditure.
YMMV
Descartes: "Cogito Ergo Sum"
Lijewski: "Sum Ergo Drive-O. Mucho!
Lijewski: "Sum Ergo Drive-O. Mucho!
Re: The Ford Transit
I have a job that includes driving a 12 person passenger van full of college students, and we recently replaced our E-350 with a Transit 350. While I can't really speak to the Transit's mechanical aspects much, since ours is still pretty new, and someone else keeps track of maintenance and does the repairs, I have found it to be an enormous upgrade over the old Econoline as far as driver comfort goes. It is a million times quieter at highway speeds. The seats are pretty comfy for as much as a 3 hour drive. The controls are pretty ergonomic. It's got a lot of storage spaces and cupholders. I really can't complain, it's a very solid modern driving experience, and does pretty dang well for long trips. I will say, I feel like the one we have is a bit slower than our old E-350, but I suspect we got the smallest engine (I haven't looked under the hood yet) for this one, which the old van didn't have.
Alex
03 2.4 Camry - 88 2.3T XR4Ti - 88 3.0 Aerostar
03 2.4 Camry - 88 2.3T XR4Ti - 88 3.0 Aerostar
- andyofcolumbusmerkur
- Level 7
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:58 pm
- Location: NE Ohio
Re: The Ford Transit
Not currently but possibly in the future. I remember at a place I worked seeing Sprinter vans coming in sometimes. Things were beat but still going well past 500,000 miles. Can't imagine newer stuff lasting that long. I'm always looking at stuff listed for sale to see what's out there.
The car will be finished soon.
- brokencase
- Level 7
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 12:18 pm
- Location: PA
Re: The Ford Transit
I miss the old Aerostar Vans. Our family had two of them over the years and they were great.
I'm sure the new Transits are much better technically. But it seems they are more directed to commercial use rather than a "family van".
I'm sure the new Transits are much better technically. But it seems they are more directed to commercial use rather than a "family van".
Specialization is for Insects
-
- Level 8
- Posts: 8669
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:53 pm
- Location: The Belly of The Beast
Re: The Ford Transit
Aerostars were truck-framed. Good for sturdiness, but Transits' suspensions should drive and ride more car like.brokencase wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:07 pm I miss the old Aerostar Vans. Our family had two of them over the years and they were great.
I'm sure the new Transits are much better technically. But it seems they are more directed to commercial use rather than a "family van".
YMMV
Descartes: "Cogito Ergo Sum"
Lijewski: "Sum Ergo Drive-O. Mucho!
Lijewski: "Sum Ergo Drive-O. Mucho!
- brokencase
- Level 7
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 12:18 pm
- Location: PA
Re: The Ford Transit
Yeah, but the Aerostar ride was fine. It was a live rear axle with separate coils springs. I drove one from Pennsylvania to Indiana for my brother's wedding and it was a very comfortable drive. I think we had six passengers ad we were getting about 23 mpg with the 3.0L engine. But the 3.0L was anemic on the hills.Ed Lijewski wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:17 pm
Aerostars were truck-framed. Good for sturdiness, but Transits' suspensions should drive and ride more car like.
YMMV
I did not find out until many years later that they offered an all wheel drive option. A full size 4.0L with all wheel drive would have been a nice vehicle to have.
I wonder if Transits have an all wheel drive option.
Specialization is for Insects