how many merkurs cashed in C4C?

Documenting your big project with photos/videos? Have photos/videos to share of anything Merkur related? Place your links to photos and videos here. Please - Merkurs and Merkur-related pictures only. Cosworths welcome!!
Carlisle and event related pictures are to be placed in the relevant section under 'Events'.
Merkur Club web site
User avatar
DPDISXR4Ti
Site Admin
Posts: 13909
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 11:40 pm
Location: New York

Post by DPDISXR4Ti »

Stealth_xr wrote:its a damn shame if they crush and destroy all that stuff....stupid government.
With the exception of the motor getting purposely destroyed, the cars pretty much get processed by a salvage yard like any other junked car. The only other exception is that they're supposed to be crushed within 6 months, but I have doubts about whether that's really being enforced.

I still think the whole program is stupid, but now that the US gov't is in the car business, I guess we should get used to these kind of things.
Brad
User avatar
Mike McCreight
Level 7
Level 7
Posts: 3987
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Ottawa! Well, Manotick, actually...

Post by Mike McCreight »

This'll all seem like small potatos when they decide to meddle with whatever large, top heavy, unionized, inefficient, doomed by design industry starts circling the drain. :?
Stay tuned.
It's not a hobby, it's an obsession!
Freejack
Level 7
Level 7
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:11 am
Location: St. Charles, MO

Post by Freejack »

John Brennan wrote:This page will explain the seeming contradiction:

http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit ... May-10.htm
Here's the background on the case your link quotes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushaber_ ... c_Railroad

No where does is the claim that wages are not taxable. The crux of the argument is whether they are indirect or direct excises. The according the above ruling they are indirect, meaning that any tax monies collected against wages must be reallocated in proportion to the population of the state (direct taxes must not), based on case law, not specific language in the constitution.

The wikipedia article notes that no court has ever ruled that the our current tax code violates this rule.

Jake
Jake Schnarre
In the St. Louis area? Join the St. Louis Area Merkur Owners Network (SLAMON) - http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/slamon/
User avatar
John Brennan
Level 8
Posts: 11630
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: Scottsdale, AZ "Summer Is Coming"

Post by John Brennan »

Well, that isn't true either, and the very site I got that info from cites a case-- Bannister Vs. (I believe) the IRS.

Once again, if you dig, and read, and pay attention to the chronology of events as the monster was created, you'll see the truth of it soon enough. The info's out there for everyone to see. Read it, judge for yourself what place the Fed, the IRS, and all the rest of the apparatus involved have in this country, and make up your own mind.
This is my car, and these are my people!
1989 XR4Ti 5-Speed
2001 BMW Z3 3.0 5-Speed
2015 Fiesta ST 6-Speed
2015 Edge 3.5 V6 Auto/Paddles
Freejack
Level 7
Level 7
Posts: 1187
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:11 am
Location: St. Charles, MO

Post by Freejack »

Hrm, the one case by that name I could find was Bannister vs US and it covered taxes related to royalties paid on patent, rule that it was income and not capital gains.

Of course there are references to Joe Banister but his was a criminal case.

Jake
Jake Schnarre
In the St. Louis area? Join the St. Louis Area Merkur Owners Network (SLAMON) - http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/slamon/
Post Reply